Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 13(3): 213-218, Jul-Sep/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-725348

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the impact of different light-curing times on dentin microtensile bond strength of two restorative systems after 24 h and 6 months of water storage. METHODS: Standardized Class II preparations were performed in 56 freshly-extracted human molars (n = 7), restored with methacrylate- or silorane-based restorative systems, and light-cured using a light-emitting diode at 1390 mW/cm2 by the recommended manufacturers' time or double this time. After storage for 24 h at 37 oC, the teeth were sectioned to yield a series of 0.8-mm thick slices. Each slab was trimmed into an hourglass shape of approximately 0.64 mm2 area at the gingival dentin-resin interface. Specimens were tested using universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure, after 24 h and 6 months of storage. Data were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The highest bond strength values were recorded for the groups restored with methacrylate system (p<0.001) as well as for extended light-curing time (p = 0.0034). There was no statistically significant difference between 24 h and 6 months storage on bond strength (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Bond strength was influenced by the material and light-curing time, but the 6-month storage did not affect the bond strength of restorations...


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Composite Resins , Curing Lights, Dental , Dental Bonding , Dentin , Methacrylates , Polymerization , Silorane Resins
2.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 10(3): 189-192, Jul.-Sep. 2011. tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-725240

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the influence of light-curing units and light-curing time on the microhardness of a nanofilled composite resin. Methods: Forty-five composite resin (Z350 - 3M) specimens were randomly prepared using Teflon ring molds (4.0 mm internal diameter and 2 mm depth) and divided into nine experimental groups (n=5): three polymerization units (conventional - 450 mW/ cm2; 2nd generation LED - 1100 mW/cm2; and 3rd generation LED - 700 mW/cm2) and three lightcuring times (20 s, 40 s, and 60 s). All specimens were polymerized with the light-curing tip positioned 8 mm far from the top surface of the specimen. After 24 h, Knoop microhardness measurements were made on the top and bottom surfaces of the specimen, with a load of 10 g for 10 s. Five indentations were made on each surface. All results were analyzed statistically by subdivided parcel ANOVA (Split-Plot) and Tukey's tests (p<0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences for the polymerization unit and light-curing time factors in either top or bottom surface. For all experimental conditions, the top surfaces showed greater hardness than the bottom surfaces (p<0.0001). Conclusions: The mode of polymerization and the lightcuring time did not affect the hardness of the nanofilled composite resin, and increasing the lightcuring time did not improve the hardness of the bottom surface of the composite resin.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Polymerization , Hardness
3.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 6(21): 1313-1319, Apr.-June 2007. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-850532

ABSTRACT

This study analyzed the esthetics components of the smile, evaluating the relationship between the curve formed by the incisal line of the anterior superior teeth and the curve of the inferior lip, the touch of this incisal line on the inferior lip, the teeth displayed during smile, the relationship between the facial midline with the arch midline, the location of the arch midline and gender differences. Eighty-eight undergraduate students of the dentistry course of the TiradentesUniversity were selected. Two photographs were taken (smiling face and smile) using digital camera. The statistical analysis was performed after image tracing evaluation. Results show that the coincidence of the facial midline with the arch midline occurred only on half of the students. Most of the students presented parallelism between the incisal plan and the interpupillary line. Smiles with or without touch of the incisal line on the lower lip, smiles revealing up to the seconds premolars or firsts molars, and parallel or straight smiles were also most commonly observed. The majority of the men presented centeredmidline arch while women presented deviation to the right. No difference was found between the distribution of the arch midline.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Male , Female , Dental Arch , Dental Occlusion , Esthetics, Dental , Smiling
4.
Rev. odonto ciênc ; 21(54): 346-350, out.-dez. 2006. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-457423

ABSTRACT

Este estudo analisou a prevalência da proporção áurea de indivíduos com sorrisos agradáveis, e sua diferença entre os sexos. Oitenta e oito estudantes do curso de odontologia da Faculdade Tiradentes foram selecionados, sendo 51 mulheres e 37 homens, entre 18 e 25 anos, obedecendo aos critérios da pesquisa. Foram realizadas as tomadas fotográficas dos dentes, utilizando câmera digital e papel milimetrado. Para a análise dos dados foi selecionado o teste do Qui-quadrado (χ2), utilizando-se o nível de significância de 5%, realizou-se a estatística com o software Bio-Estat 2.0. Os resultados mostraram que homens e mulheres não diferem quanto à presença da proporção áurea entre os incisivos centrais e laterais no lado esquerdo e a proporção áurea no lado direito está mais prevalente em mulheres do que nos homens. Homens e mulheres não apresentam proporção áurea entre os incisivos laterais e caninos no lado direito e a proporção áurea no lado esquerdo está mais prevalente em mulheres do que nos homens. A relação de proporção áurea não é aplicada na maior parte da população.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Esthetics, Dental , Smiling
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL